unionsilikon.blogg.se

Big aperture vs small aperture
Big aperture vs small aperture










big aperture vs small aperture

It covers many variables whereas it affects the number of factors in the photographs.

big aperture vs small aperture

The aperture in photography is the most important elements among the three i.e. We will come up with numerous articles about photography in upcoming days which will definately improve your photography skills.īut for now, let's discuss the inevitable elements of photography that is none other than Aperture in photography. It might not sound a lot, but when you have to carry it with you for days it will make a big difference.Tired of not getting a perfect shot? Don't worry we have your back. Change those lenses into the f/4 versions, and you will save almost 2 kilograms of weight. When you take the Canon f/2.8 trinity lenses with you ( EF 16-35mm, EF 24-70mm and EF 70-200mm) you end up with nearly 4 kilograms. Although this might be not much of an argument, it will make a lot of difference for photographers who like to travel. Lenses with a large aperture are often very heavy because these lenses require a lot of glass. Often a lens with f/4 has the same light fall off as the f/2.8 stopped down to f/4. If you want to prevent this, you might also choose a lens with a smaller aperture like f/4. But keep in mind these lenses will have a significant light falloff at the corners.

Big aperture vs small aperture iso#

I think you could benefit from a camera with a good high ISO performance instead.ĭo you love to shoot a Milky Way at night, or landscapes underneath a starry sky? A large aperture will capture more light. If you prefer stopping down the lens, you don’t need that large aperture at all. But keep the thin depth of field in mind. If you are shooting at dark venues with relatively fast shutter speeds, you can benefit from a large aperture. I intentionally did not use the widest aperture available, to avoid the depth of field to be too small (EOS 1Dx + EF 85mm f/1,2 f/2,5 | ISO100 | 1/320s | hi speed sync fill-in flash in a softbox) But if you prefer using the lens at something like f/8, you are better off with a lens that has a normal maximum aperture like f/4 or even f/5.6 Look at your preferences in photography before deciding to spend your hard-earned money on these lenses.ĭo you like photographing with a razor thin depth of field, you might invest in these lenses. Should You Buy a Large Aperture Lens or NotĪlthough it is a personal choice, don’t think you need to have the heavy and expensive large aperture lenses. It may prevent you from using high ISO levels, but it can lead to not enough sharpness and difficulties with focusing on the right spot. But in those cases, you must take the small depth of field into account.

big aperture vs small aperture

Weddings, concerts and indoor sports can really benefit from a large aperture. In case you often shoot in dark environments, you probably would like to capture as much light as possible. I should have used a smaller aperture like f/4. You may not see it in this small size picture, but only one eye is sharp. Razor thin depth of field may seem nice, but before you realize one eye is sharp, and the other is not. There are some other things to keep in mind regarding large apertures. But I think these are the most important ones.

big aperture vs small aperture

You probably would have guessed these reasons, and perhaps you can come up with a few more.

  • Making an optimal use of the auto focus capabilities of your camera.
  • Being able to shoot faster shutter speeds in darker environments.
  • Shooting in dark environments and still capturing enough light.
  • Shooting a minimum depth of field with a nice bokeh.
  • Yes, I admit, these lenses are not always the best performing lenses available, but I did not want any other lens. So, should you also invest in large aperture lenses that have f/2.8 or larger?īefore I try to answer this, I would like to sum up some reasons when you can benefit from a large aperture. These are amazing pieces of engineering, which all have their ups and downs. Every fixed focus lens I bought had an aperture of f/1.4 and I even choose to buy a f/1.2 lens also. Since that time every zoom lens I bought had a f/2.8 aperture, except the Canon EF 17-40mm, which has only f/4. I wanted to have that f/2.8, no matter what. It would have saved me a lot of money, money I could have used to invest in another nice lens. I could have chosen a f/4 lens also, which is significant lighter, and half as expensive. I was so proud having this lens, enjoying not only shooting with it, but also the reactions from fellow photographers who were perhaps more wise by spending not all their money on these really expensive lenses.












    Big aperture vs small aperture